Internet buzz and rabid speculation surrounded
Cloverfield for months, prior to its release on January 18th 2008...The question is: Now that it's finally here--Does the film live up to all of the hype? I say Yes.
The Story: On the night of May 22, Jason (
Mike Vogel) and his girlfriend Lily (
Jessica Lucas) throw a surprise going-away party for Jason's brother, Rob (
Michael Stahl-David), after he lands a big job promotion that's gonna relocate him to Japan. Just prior to the guest of honor's arrival, Jason asks "Hud" (
T.J. Miller) to chronicle the festivities of Rob's last night in the U.S. with a hand held camcorder. At first, he is quite reluctant to do so, But as soon as he notices that the object of his affection, Marlena (
Lizzy Caplan), is in the room, Hud's ready to roll.
Shortly after Rob finally arrives, an argument erupts between Rob and his friend, Beth (
Odette Yustman), and Rob confides to his close friends that they had hooked up a month ago. Rob is mad because Beth has arrived with a date. Beth is upset at Rob for not calling her after getting together. She leaves the party abruptly. Hud and Jason then encourage Rob to pursue a romantic relationship with Beth despite the fact he's leaving the country.
Suddenly the building rocks with earthquake intensity as loud animal-like noises can be heard outside. From the roof, the friends see a large explosion in the distance and they flee to the street where the head of the Statue of Liberty crashes to the ground. Several more explosions and glimpses of a ginormous creature are visible in the distance... The small group of pals decide that the best way to ensure their survival is to leave Manhattan--But first--they must rescue Beth.
The Film: Word is that
J.J. Abrams was in line to direct this monster tale, but because he decided to helm the
Star Trek reboot,
Matt Reeves was asked to step in...No worries though, Cloverfield has plenty of Abrams' style all over it...
As written by
Drew Goddard the script is exceedingly straightforward and uncluttered--which is one reason why it works. The beginning of the film took me right back to
September 11, 2001, with it's stark dismantling of Lady Liberty and scenes of folks running for their lives as utter chaos rains down everywhere.
The media has made a big deal over the fact that the "always in motion" cinematography has
hit some viewers in the gut--causing disorientation and dizziness--I had no trouble at all with that aspect of the film. I was too caught up in the plight of Rob and company...
The filmmakers offer just enough of a glimpse of the monster so that we the audience are intrigued to know what the characters are facing-but they wisely keep that to a minimum--Allowing the characters to carry the load rather than special effects or CGI. To that end, the cast does a great job of keeping it "real" amid the unreality of it all...
It's impossible not to think of the 1999 film
The Blair Witch Project which Cloverfield patterns itself after, for sure. From its mysterious marketing campaign, the style of filming--Using no big name stars--to its "ambiguous" conclusion. It's all there.
To me, there's nothing wrong with letting the viewer try and figure things out...Not every flick has to explain the who what and why-for it to work. I just hope that despite the film's success-everyone resists the temptation of a sequel, ala`
Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2. My way of thinking is that that would only serve to to diminish Cloverfield as a film--if there is a sequel--Leave it alone guys...
As is often the case with TV's
Lost--Cloverfield poses more questions than it answers. But unlike the serialized drama-I am totally OK with that as far as this film is concerned...
For what it is, it's a great monster movie that is a worthy trip to the cineplex...